Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,030,539 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to an increase of 4.5 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 37.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,347 compared to $111,602, a difference of 22.2%), and median family income ($93,988 compared to $114,553, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,437 compared to $52,540, a difference of 0.20%), median female earnings ($40,895 compared to $42,542, a difference of 4.0%), and median earnings ($45,729 compared to $51,038, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 51.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.8%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 36.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 32.2%), and male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.4%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 30.0%), and married-couple households (41.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 87.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 41.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 13.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 31.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 35.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 87.0%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 57.8%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.1%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.8%).