Hmong vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,373,493 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.081% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 81.4 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $49,448, a difference of 29.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $112,484, a difference of 27.7%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $61,228, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $53,552, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $65,209, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 26.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 7.2%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and single male poverty (14.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 38.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 22.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 0.73%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.8%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.7%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 21.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 6.9%).