Navajo vs Lithuanian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Navajo
Lithuanian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Navajo
Lithuanians
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Lithuanian Integration in Navajo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,184,648 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.497. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Lithuanians.
Navajo vs Lithuanian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $49,448, a difference of 70.3%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $115,395, a difference of 62.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $112,484, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $53,552, a difference of 26.4%), median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $42,108, a difference of 27.4%), and wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 28.5%).
Income Metric | Navajo | Lithuanian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $29,031 | Exceptional $49,448 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $70,989 | Exceptional $115,395 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $59,159 | Exceptional $93,852 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,999 | Exceptional $50,991 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,098 | Exceptional $61,228 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,046 | Exceptional $42,108 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $42,380 | Exceptional $53,552 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $66,529 | Exceptional $105,223 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $69,759 | Exceptional $112,484 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $47,722 | Exceptional $65,209 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 28.7% |
Navajo vs Lithuanian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 199.4%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 161.8%), and male poverty (22.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 133.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 46.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 62.1%), and single female poverty (31.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 64.8%).
Poverty Metric | Navajo | Lithuanian |
Poverty | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 22.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 23.3% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 14.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 30.5% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 25.3% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 31.7% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 29.2% | Tragic 17.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 40.2% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Navajo vs Lithuanian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 111.5%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 97.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 96.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Navajo | Lithuanian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 16.1% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.2% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.6% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.7% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.7% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.5% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Navajo vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 26.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 18.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 15.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Navajo | Lithuanian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 56.6% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.2% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.1% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 64.8% | Exceptional 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.6% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 73.8% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 73.8% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Navajo vs Lithuanian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 74.3%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 62.7%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (66.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Navajo | Lithuanian |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Fair 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.1% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.65 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.0% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 29.6% |
Navajo vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.0%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Navajo | Lithuanian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.8% | Exceptional 91.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.3% | Exceptional 58.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.3% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Average 6.3% |
Navajo vs Lithuanian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 88.2%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 87.3%), and bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.65%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.66%).
Education Level Metric | Navajo | Lithuanian |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.1% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Exceptional 97.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 95.8% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 94.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.1% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.2% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 88.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.3% | Exceptional 68.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.8% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 32.6% | Exceptional 50.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 42.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Navajo vs Lithuanian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 55.8%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 15.4%).
Disability Metric | Navajo | Lithuanian |
Disability | Tragic 14.3% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Average 12.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Excellent 10.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 58.3% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |