Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hawaiians

Lithuanians

Fair
Excellent
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Hawaiian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,431,510 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 8.9 Lithuanians.
Hawaiian Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $49,448, a difference of 25.5%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $61,228, a difference of 21.3%), and median earnings ($43,673 compared to $50,991, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $65,209, a difference of 0.45%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $53,552, a difference of 0.89%), and median household income ($84,729 compared to $93,852, a difference of 10.8%).
Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricHawaiianLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,403
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Poor
$98,869
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Average
$84,729
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,673
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,488
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,497
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$53,078
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$90,722
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,778
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,920
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Tragic
28.7%

Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 33.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 29.9%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.19%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.0%).
Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricHawaiianLithuanian
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Average
9.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Fair
13.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Average
29.2%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.7%

Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHawaiianLithuanian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%

Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHawaiianLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.4%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.2%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.5%
Exceptional
83.6%

Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.0%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 2.2%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.1%).
Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHawaiianLithuanian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.4%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.41
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.2%
Exceptional
29.6%

Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.9%).
Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHawaiianLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.4%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.3%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.9%
Average
6.3%

Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 56.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.4%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.75%).
Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricHawaiianLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.8%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
85.0%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.81%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.4%).
Hawaiian vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricHawaiianLithuanian
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.5%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%