Icelander vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Icelander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Icelanders

Lithuanians

Good
Excellent
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Icelander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,536,397 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.489. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.161% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 160.8 Lithuanians.
Icelander Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Icelander vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($104,282 compared to $115,395, a difference of 10.7%), median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $61,228, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,560 compared to $105,223, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $53,552, a difference of 4.5%), wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $65,209, a difference of 6.4%).
Icelander vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricIcelanderLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$44,987
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Good
$104,282
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Good
$85,797
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Good
$46,916
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,415
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,109
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,247
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,560
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,261
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,270
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.5%
Tragic
28.7%

Icelander vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 18.9%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.8%).
Icelander vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricIcelanderLithuanian
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.7%

Icelander vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 40.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.38%).
Icelander vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIcelanderLithuanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.2%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%

Icelander vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 0.86%).
Icelander vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIcelanderLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Exceptional
83.6%

Icelander vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Icelander vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIcelanderLithuanian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Exceptional
29.6%

Icelander vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.8%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 0.36%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.9%).
Icelander vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIcelanderLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Average
6.3%

Icelander vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.4%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
Icelander vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricIcelanderLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.3%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.5%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.3%

Icelander vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.34%), male disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.88%).
Icelander vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricIcelanderLithuanian
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.7%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%