Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,735,076 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Immigrant from Southern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Southern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Southern Europe corresponds to an increase of 23.0 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 8.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,902 compared to $65,209, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,775 compared to $112,484, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,275 compared to $42,108, a difference of 0.40%), median earnings ($50,280 compared to $50,991, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,486 compared to $105,223, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 2.9%), single female poverty (19.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.6%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.53%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 54.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 5.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 51.2%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.1%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.66%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.6%).