Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Lithuanians

Fair
Excellent
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,314,010 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 60.1 Lithuanians.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $105,223, a difference of 45.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $112,484, a difference of 44.5%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $93,852, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $42,108, a difference of 22.7%), householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $53,552, a difference of 23.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $65,209, a difference of 26.9%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
28.7%

Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 66.5%), family poverty (11.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 65.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.6%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 17.9%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoLithuanian
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.7%

Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 46.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoLithuanian
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
83.6%

Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 49.3%), married-couple households (39.0% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.8%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.10, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (59.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 8.1%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoLithuanian
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
29.6%

Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.5%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.5%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Average
6.3%

Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 66.3%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.7%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.3%

Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 23.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), male disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoLithuanian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%