Hopi vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hopi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hopi

Lithuanians

Poor
Excellent
1,478
SOCIAL INDEX
12.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
306th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Hopi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,314,658 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Hopi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hopi within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hopi corresponds to a decrease of 17.4 Lithuanians.
Hopi Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Hopi vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hopi and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,177 compared to $49,448, a difference of 58.6%), median family income ($77,188 compared to $115,395, a difference of 49.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,562 compared to $112,484, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($46,978 compared to $53,552, a difference of 14.0%), median female earnings ($33,932 compared to $42,108, a difference of 24.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,925 compared to $65,209, a difference of 28.1%).
Hopi vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricHopiLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$31,177
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,188
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Tragic
$65,043
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,871
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,060
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,932
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,978
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$75,002
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$75,562
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,925
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
28.7%

Hopi vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hopi and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 123.0%), family poverty (15.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 121.7%), and male poverty (20.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 118.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 25.8%), single female poverty (28.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 46.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 50.9%).
Hopi vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricHopiLithuanian
Poverty
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
27.9%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Tragic
27.5%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
9.7%

Hopi vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hopi and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (11.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 122.3%), male unemployment (10.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 116.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (16.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 116.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.6%).
Hopi vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHopiLithuanian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
30.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
19.9%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
13.5%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
11.9%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
8.1%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
16.8%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.0%

Hopi vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hopi and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 27.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (66.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (76.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (58.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 11.1%).
Hopi vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHopiLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
58.4%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
71.7%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
66.0%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
76.5%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.3%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Hopi vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hopi and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (50.8% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 72.0%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 55.9%), and currently married (36.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.1%).
Hopi vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHopiLithuanian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.60
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
50.8%
Exceptional
29.6%

Hopi vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 62.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.0% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 6.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.8%).
Hopi vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHopiLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.4%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Average
6.3%

Hopi vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hopi and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (25.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 67.0%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 63.2%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.31%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.32%).
Hopi vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricHopiLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Good
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Good
95.9%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.1%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.9%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.3%

Hopi vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 196.5%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 42.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.3%), male disability (12.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.9%).
Hopi vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricHopiLithuanian
Disability
Tragic
13.2%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
13.7%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
4.6%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.9%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.0%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.9%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.6%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.4%