Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Guatemalans

Lithuanians

Poor
Excellent
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Guatemalan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,749,973 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 4.9 Lithuanians.
Guatemalan Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $61,228, a difference of 31.0%), per capita income ($37,766 compared to $49,448, a difference of 30.9%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $115,395, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $53,552, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $42,108, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $65,209, a difference of 19.6%).
Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricGuatemalanLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,766
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,295
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,961
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,205
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,736
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,695
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,525
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,331
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,705
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,526
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
28.7%

Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 77.7%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 63.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.9%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 10.7%).
Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricGuatemalanLithuanian
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
9.7%

Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.6%).
Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGuatemalanLithuanian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%

Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGuatemalanLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.2%
Exceptional
83.6%

Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 41.0%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.8%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 8.7%).
Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGuatemalanLithuanian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.9%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.40
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.9%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.1%
Exceptional
29.6%

Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 30.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.24%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 7.6%).
Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGuatemalanLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Average
6.3%

Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 140.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 60.0%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricGuatemalanLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
86.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.5%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.8%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.3%

Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 27.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.18%), disability (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.2%).
Guatemalan vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricGuatemalanLithuanian
Disability
Good
11.6%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Good
12.1%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.5%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%