Pueblo vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pueblo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pueblo

Lithuanians

Poor
Excellent
2,100
SOCIAL INDEX
18.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
270th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Pueblo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,357,416 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Pueblo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pueblo corresponds to an increase of 3.4 Lithuanians.
Pueblo Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Pueblo vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,012 compared to $49,448, a difference of 54.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($68,910 compared to $105,223, a difference of 52.7%), and median family income ($76,880 compared to $115,395, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,018 compared to $53,552, a difference of 19.0%), householder income over 65 years ($52,930 compared to $65,209, a difference of 23.2%), and median female earnings ($32,564 compared to $42,108, a difference of 29.3%).
Pueblo vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricPuebloLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$32,012
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Tragic
$76,880
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Tragic
$64,692
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,859
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$41,314
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,564
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,018
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$68,910
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$75,601
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,930
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.7%
Tragic
28.7%

Pueblo vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 180.8%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 136.4%), and receiving food stamps (19.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 106.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (21.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 22.2%), single mother poverty (37.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 35.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 43.9%).
Pueblo vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricPuebloLithuanian
Poverty
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
28.6%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
37.2%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
9.7%

Pueblo vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 70.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 59.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.1%).
Pueblo vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPuebloLithuanian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.2%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.4%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.0%

Pueblo vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 9.4%).
Pueblo vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPuebloLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
59.3%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
72.6%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.9%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.5%
Exceptional
83.6%

Pueblo vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (53.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 81.6%), single father households (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.4%), family households (68.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.5%).
Pueblo vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPuebloLithuanian
Family Households
Exceptional
68.2%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.0%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.79
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
38.2%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
53.7%
Exceptional
29.6%

Pueblo vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 35.6%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 27.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.4%).
Pueblo vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPuebloLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.6%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Average
6.3%

Pueblo vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 72.7%), bachelor's degree (25.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 65.4%), and associate's degree (34.0% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
Pueblo vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricPuebloLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.0%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
25.5%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.3%

Pueblo vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (33.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 54.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 14.8%).
Pueblo vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricPuebloLithuanian
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.3%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
33.1%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.9%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.6%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.6%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.4%