Tohono O'odham vs Lithuanian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Lithuanian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Lithuanians
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Lithuanian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,023,908 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Lithuanians.
Tohono O'odham vs Lithuanian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $49,448, a difference of 63.4%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $115,395, a difference of 59.8%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $61,228, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $53,552, a difference of 18.3%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $42,108, a difference of 26.8%), and wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 29.8%).
Income Metric | Tohono O'odham | Lithuanian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,256 | Exceptional $49,448 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $72,193 | Exceptional $115,395 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $61,663 | Exceptional $93,852 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,349 | Exceptional $50,991 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $39,543 | Exceptional $61,228 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,205 | Exceptional $42,108 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,248 | Exceptional $53,552 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $69,068 | Exceptional $105,223 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,774 | Exceptional $112,484 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,121 | Exceptional $65,209 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 28.7% |
Tohono O'odham vs Lithuanian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 183.9%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 183.4%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 139.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 27.3%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 57.1%), and single male poverty (21.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 65.6%).
Poverty Metric | Tohono O'odham | Lithuanian |
Poverty | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 24.7% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.7% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 14.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 34.2% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 17.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Tohono O'odham vs Lithuanian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 104.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 97.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 91.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Tohono O'odham | Lithuanian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.5% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.1% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.1% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 10.2% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Tohono O'odham vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 29.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 11.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tohono O'odham | Lithuanian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.2% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.4% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.6% | Exceptional 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.7% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.1% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Tohono O'odham vs Lithuanian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 81.1%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 68.7%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 68.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (67.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Tohono O'odham | Lithuanian |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Fair 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.9% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.53 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 36.8% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 49.8% | Exceptional 29.6% |
Tohono O'odham vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 85.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 8.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Lithuanian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 8.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 91.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.0% | Exceptional 58.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Average 6.3% |
Tohono O'odham vs Lithuanian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 89.1%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 82.8%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 73.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.77%).
Education Level Metric | Tohono O'odham | Lithuanian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 97.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 97.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 96.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Exceptional 95.8% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.6% | Exceptional 94.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 88.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 68.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.1% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Exceptional 50.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 42.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Tohono O'odham vs Lithuanian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 68.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 55.0%), and ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 18.5%).
Disability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Lithuanian |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Average 12.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Excellent 10.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 36.0% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.7% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.7% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.4% |