Pakistani vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pakistani
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pakistanis

Lithuanians

Good
Excellent
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Pakistani Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 289,934,310 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Pakistani communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.654. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pakistanis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.186% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pakistanis corresponds to an increase of 185.9 Lithuanians.
Pakistani Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Pakistani vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 10.3%), per capita income ($45,587 compared to $49,448, a difference of 8.5%), and median male earnings ($56,719 compared to $61,228, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,325 compared to $53,552, a difference of 0.43%), householder income over 65 years ($63,844 compared to $65,209, a difference of 2.1%), and median female earnings ($40,596 compared to $42,108, a difference of 3.7%).
Pakistani vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricPakistaniLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,587
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,390
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,638
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,254
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,719
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,596
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,325
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,401
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,317
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,844
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.1%
Tragic
28.7%

Pakistani vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 19.5%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.2%).
Pakistani vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricPakistaniLithuanian
Poverty
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.7%

Pakistani vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
Pakistani vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPakistaniLithuanian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Pakistani vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.99%).
Pakistani vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPakistaniLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.6%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Exceptional
83.6%

Pakistani vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.9%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.95%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 3.2%).
Pakistani vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPakistaniLithuanian
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Exceptional
29.6%

Pakistani vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.9%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Pakistani vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPakistaniLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Average
6.3%

Pakistani vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 46.6%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and master's degree (15.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.72%).
Pakistani vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricPakistaniLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Fair
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.4%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.5%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.5%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.1%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.7%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.8%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.3%

Pakistani vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 22.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.060%), female disability (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Pakistani vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricPakistaniLithuanian
Disability
Average
11.7%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.1%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.2%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%