Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Taiwanese

Lithuanians

Good
Excellent
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Taiwanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,016,671 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.125% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to a decrease of 124.6 Lithuanians.
Taiwanese Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 14.3%), median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $61,228, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,180 compared to $112,484, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $105,223, a difference of 3.7%), householder income over 65 years ($62,894 compared to $65,209, a difference of 3.7%), and median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $42,108, a difference of 3.8%).
Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricTaiwaneseLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,455
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,295
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,900
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,902
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,556
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,576
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,804
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,492
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,180
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,894
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Tragic
28.7%

Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.0%), single father poverty (14.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.42%), single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricTaiwaneseLithuanian
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.5%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
9.7%

Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 50.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 46.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.69%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTaiwaneseLithuanian
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%

Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTaiwaneseLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.6%

Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in currently married (45.8% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 7.1%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.63%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTaiwaneseLithuanian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Exceptional
29.6%

Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 38.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.48%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 8.1%).
Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTaiwaneseLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.0%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Average
6.3%

Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 73.4%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricTaiwaneseLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.4%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.7%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.0%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.3%

Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 6.0%).
Taiwanese vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricTaiwaneseLithuanian
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%