Jamaican vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,078,853 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Jamaican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.294. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jamaicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jamaicans corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 25.7%), per capita income ($39,231 compared to $43,997, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,327 compared to $96,086, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,670 compared to $38,945, a difference of 0.71%), householder income under 25 years ($50,929 compared to $52,302, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,560 compared to $56,975, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 30.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 25.8%), male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.2% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.4%), births to unmarried women (38.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.31 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 50.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.1% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.8% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and bachelor's degree (33.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and 11th grade (91.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.1%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.9%).