Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,124,373 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.536. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 49.2 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,988 compared to $56,975, a difference of 8.8%), median household income ($89,010 compared to $82,560, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $52,302, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($43,852 compared to $43,997, a difference of 0.33%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and median female earnings ($39,871 compared to $38,945, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.5%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.44%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 6.5%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.31 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.60%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.1%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.9%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.4%).