Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,711,238 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.898. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.706% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to an increase of 705.5 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($120,445 compared to $98,205, a difference of 22.7%), per capita income ($53,799 compared to $43,997, a difference of 22.3%), and median male earnings ($64,625 compared to $52,860, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,612 compared to $52,302, a difference of 0.59%), median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $38,945, a difference of 12.1%), and wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 30.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.28%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.1%), no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 63.6%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 40.8%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.070%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.48%).