Celtic vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,647,765 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.747. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.238% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 238.1 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.7%), householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $56,975, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $52,302, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,732 compared to $45,682, a difference of 0.11%), median household income ($83,193 compared to $82,560, a difference of 0.77%), and per capita income ($43,621 compared to $43,997, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 30.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 29.7%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.9%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.8%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.18%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 47.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 42.5%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and college, under 1 year (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (45.8% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 36.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.9%).