Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Uruguay
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Immigrants from Uruguay

Fair
Fair
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,806
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
209th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Uruguay Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,427,506 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 19.7 Immigrants from Uruguay.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Immigrants from Uruguay Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $43,997, a difference of 10.5%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $52,302, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $56,975, a difference of 0.24%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $38,945, a difference of 2.4%), and median earnings ($43,998 compared to $45,682, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Uruguay
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Average
$43,997
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Tragic
$98,205
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Poor
$82,560
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Fair
$45,682
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Poor
$52,860
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Poor
$38,945
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Average
$52,302
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Poor
$91,171
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Poor
$96,086
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Tragic
$56,975
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Exceptional
24.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 18.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.7%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Uruguay
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Poor
9.5%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Poor
14.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Fair
17.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Fair
16.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Poor
17.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Fair
16.7%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
14.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Poor
12.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Uruguay
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.50%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Uruguay
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
34.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.6%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.19%), currently married (44.3% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Uruguay
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Tragic
44.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Tragic
33.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.4%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.0%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Uruguay
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
11.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
88.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Tragic
51.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Tragic
17.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
5.4%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.2%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.5%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.1% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.72%), 8th grade (94.1% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and 7th grade (94.5% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.76%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Uruguay
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Tragic
91.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Tragic
87.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
84.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Tragic
63.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Poor
58.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Average
37.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Average
15.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Uruguay Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Uruguay
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
46.4%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Excellent
2.4%