Laotian vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,075,112 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 9.8 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $56,975, a difference of 16.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $96,086, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $91,171, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $52,302, a difference of 4.0%), per capita income ($47,041 compared to $43,997, a difference of 6.9%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 25.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.60%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 19.1%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.89%), family households (65.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 36.4%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 31.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.9%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.0%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.64%).