Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,875,354 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.681. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.237% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 1,236.8 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $72,193, a difference of 52.4%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $30,256, a difference of 51.4%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $61,663, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $45,248, a difference of 13.3%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $33,205, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 175.0%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 161.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 126.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 41.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 51.8%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 54.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 120.2%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 112.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 103.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 73.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 72.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.34%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (64.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 72.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 82.6%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 82.6%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.42%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 85.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 67.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.4%).