Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scandinavians

Tohono O'odham

Good
Tragic
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Scandinavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,904,371 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.694. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 4.269% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 4,269.3 Tohono O'odham.
Scandinavian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,848 compared to $30,256, a difference of 44.9%), median family income ($104,410 compared to $72,193, a difference of 44.6%), and median male earnings ($55,527 compared to $39,543, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $33,205, a difference of 15.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $45,248, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $49,121, a difference of 25.4%).
Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricScandinavianTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,848
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Good
$104,410
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Good
$86,073
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Average
$46,433
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,527
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,306
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,654
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,596
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,969
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,586
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
22.1%

Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 170.4%), family poverty (7.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 167.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 128.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 35.2%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 48.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 53.1%).
Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricScandinavianTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.3%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
21.5%

Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 116.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 109.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 98.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.8%).
Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScandinavianTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.9%

Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 39.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 10.4%).
Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScandinavianTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
75.1%

Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 67.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 60.7%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.10%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (65.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScandinavianTohono O'odham
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Tragic
49.8%

Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 122.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 25.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 24.2%).
Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScandinavianTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.1%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Excellent
6.6%

Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.1%), bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 53.7%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.72%).
Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricScandinavianTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.7%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Good
46.9%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 54.0%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 42.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.8%).
Scandinavian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricScandinavianTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%