Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Tohono O'odham
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,555,814 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 24.7 Tohono O'odham.
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $30,256, a difference of 21.1%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $72,193, a difference of 20.3%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $39,543, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $45,248, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $33,205, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $49,121, a difference of 9.6%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 106.3%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 81.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 71.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 17.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 19.7%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 23.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 21.5% |
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 58.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 55.6%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 40.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 75.1% |
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 23.7%), currently married (43.2% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.8%), family households (62.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 49.8% |
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 65.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Excellent 6.6% |
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.3%), associate's degree (40.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chippewa vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 29.6%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (14.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 2.3%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability (14.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.4%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.1% |