French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

French American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

French American Indians

Tohono O'odham

Poor
Tragic
1,780
SOCIAL INDEX
15.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
288th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in French American Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,404,128 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.794. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.290% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 290.4 Tohono O'odham.
French American Indian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,244 compared to $30,256, a difference of 33.0%), median family income ($92,872 compared to $72,193, a difference of 28.6%), and median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $39,543, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $45,248, a difference of 8.2%), median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $33,205, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $49,121, a difference of 11.4%).
French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricFrench American IndianTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,244
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,872
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,387
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,333
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,611
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,920
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,977
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,899
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$89,811
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,699
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.4%
Exceptional
22.1%

French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 105.1%), family poverty (10.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 99.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 26.3%), single mother poverty (33.1% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 29.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 39.2%).
French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricFrench American IndianTohono O'odham
Poverty
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
24.6%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.1%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
21.5%

French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 85.1%), male unemployment (5.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 72.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.8%).
French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFrench American IndianTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
8.9%

French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 27.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.7%).
French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFrench American IndianTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.8%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.8%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.2%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.8%
Tragic
75.1%

French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 48.9%), births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 36.2%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.4%), family households (62.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 10.0%).
French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFrench American IndianTohono O'odham
Family Households
Tragic
62.4%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.1%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.20
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.6%
Tragic
49.8%

French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.9%).
French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFrench American IndianTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.8%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Excellent
6.6%

French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (33.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 35.4%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.1%), and associate's degree (42.0% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.14%).
French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricFrench American IndianTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Average
93.7%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.7%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.7%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.4%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.0%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.1%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%

French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 64.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 39.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.77%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability (13.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.2%).
French American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricFrench American IndianTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.8%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
3.1%