Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Tohono O'odham

Good
Tragic
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,347,728 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 8.6 Tohono O'odham.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($56,709 compared to $30,256, a difference of 87.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $69,068, a difference of 85.5%), and median family income ($131,067 compared to $72,193, a difference of 81.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 15.3%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $45,248, a difference of 37.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $49,121, a difference of 45.7%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Exceptional
22.1%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 181.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 161.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 157.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 49.0%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 54.5%), and single mother poverty (24.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 76.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
21.5%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 95.0%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 93.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 92.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 18.3%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
8.9%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.7%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
75.1%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 111.5%), single father households (1.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 108.7%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 88.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.53, a difference of 8.4%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongTohono O'odham
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
49.8%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 38.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 125.2%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 110.7%), and bachelor's degree (48.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 97.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.2% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.17%), 6th grade (96.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and 5th grade (96.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 131.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 104.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 81.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 22.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.4%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%