Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Guamanian/Chamorro
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Guamanians/Chamorros

Tohono O'odham

Fair
Tragic
4,082
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
205th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Guamanian/Chamorro Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,965,730 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 47.7 Tohono O'odham.
Guamanian/Chamorro Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($101,061 compared to $72,193, a difference of 40.0%), median household income ($86,255 compared to $61,663, a difference of 39.9%), and per capita income ($41,678 compared to $30,256, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,717 compared to $33,205, a difference of 16.6%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $45,248, a difference of 18.1%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricGuamanian/ChamorroTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,678
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,061
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Good
$86,255
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,933
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,661
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,717
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,423
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,569
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,170
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,187
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Exceptional
22.1%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 131.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 127.3%), and male poverty (11.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 108.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 45.8%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 46.2%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 58.3%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricGuamanian/ChamorroTohono O'odham
Poverty
Good
12.1%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Good
13.3%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Tragic
21.5%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 90.7%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 86.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 78.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 15.6%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGuamanian/ChamorroTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
8.9%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.6%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGuamanian/ChamorroTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.2%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.7%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.4%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
75.1%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 57.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 48.2%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.79%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 6.1%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGuamanian/ChamorroTohono O'odham
Family Households
Exceptional
66.6%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.7%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.1%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Tragic
49.8%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 95.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 23.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 20.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.6%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.5%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.2%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Excellent
6.6%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (34.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 41.9%), associate's degree (43.8% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 37.7%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricGuamanian/ChamorroTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Fair
97.0%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.8%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 77.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 42.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.4%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.4%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.1%