Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
Canadian
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Canadians
Tohono O'odham
7,303
SOCIAL INDEX
70.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
123rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in Canadian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,933,674 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.239% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 239.2 Tohono O'odham.
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,858 compared to $30,256, a difference of 51.6%), median family income ($106,597 compared to $72,193, a difference of 47.7%), and median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $39,543, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $45,248, a difference of 15.7%), median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $33,205, a difference of 19.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $49,121, a difference of 26.7%).
Income Metric | Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,858 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,597 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,769 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,911 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,286 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,724 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Average $52,336 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,625 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,560 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $62,230 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 149.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 146.9%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 117.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 28.9%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 46.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 57.4%).
Poverty Metric | Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.6% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.7% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Average 21.1% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.3% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 21.5% |
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 100.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 98.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 83.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 8.9% |
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 28.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 9.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.1% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.6% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.4% | Tragic 75.1% |
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 67.7%), births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 56.1%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (64.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.2% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.3% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.9% | Tragic 49.8% |
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 87.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 11.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Excellent 6.6% |
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 64.3%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 61.6%), and bachelor's degree (38.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.4% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.5% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.8% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 1.5% |
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 57.3%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.5%).
Disability Metric | Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 3.1% |