Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Taiwanese

Tohono O'odham

Good
Tragic
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Taiwanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,452,978 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.929. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.162% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 161.9 Tohono O'odham.
Taiwanese Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,455 compared to $30,256, a difference of 53.5%), median family income ($107,295 compared to $72,193, a difference of 48.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $69,068, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $45,248, a difference of 10.1%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $33,205, a difference of 22.2%).
Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricTaiwaneseTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,455
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,295
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,900
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,902
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,556
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,576
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,804
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,492
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,180
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,894
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
22.1%

Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 149.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 134.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 118.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 46.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 52.3%), and single father poverty (14.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 53.7%).
Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricTaiwaneseTohono O'odham
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Good
13.1%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.5%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
21.5%

Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 101.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 97.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 91.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTaiwaneseTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.9%

Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 8.9%).
Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTaiwaneseTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.8%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
75.1%

Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 74.0%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 72.0%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.7%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households (63.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 6.0%).
Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTaiwaneseTohono O'odham
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Tragic
49.8%

Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 34.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.2%).
Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTaiwaneseTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.0%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Excellent
6.6%

Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 74.9%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 65.7%), and bachelor's degree (40.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 63.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.080%), 7th grade (94.8% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and 8th grade (94.7% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.21%).
Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricTaiwaneseTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.4%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.7%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.0%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 70.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 66.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.6%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.0%).
Taiwanese vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricTaiwaneseTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%