Pima vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,140,636 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 16.0 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $69,068, a difference of 19.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $45,248, a difference of 13.8%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $72,193, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $73,774, a difference of 0.56%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $30,256, a difference of 1.3%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $61,663, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 49.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 24.8%), and receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 76.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 40.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.3%), single father households (4.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (35.9% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.3%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 106.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.5%).