Polish vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Polish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Poles

Tohono O'odham

Excellent
Tragic
8,413
SOCIAL INDEX
81.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
72nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Polish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,543,848 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Polish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Poles within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Poles corresponds to an increase of 7.3 Tohono O'odham.
Polish Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Polish vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Polish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,123 compared to $30,256, a difference of 52.4%), median family income ($108,507 compared to $72,193, a difference of 50.3%), and median male earnings ($58,139 compared to $39,543, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,407 compared to $45,248, a difference of 15.8%), median female earnings ($40,371 compared to $33,205, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,598 compared to $49,121, a difference of 25.4%).
Polish vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricPolishTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,123
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,507
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,472
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,659
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,139
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,371
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,407
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,685
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,952
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,598
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.5%
Exceptional
22.1%

Polish vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Polish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 178.8%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 174.3%), and male poverty (9.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 135.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 27.1%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 51.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 65.2%).
Polish vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricPolishTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
21.5%

Polish vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Polish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 105.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 100.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 91.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.1%).
Polish vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPolishTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.9%

Polish vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Polish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 34.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 11.2%).
Polish vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPolishTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
42.1%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.6%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
75.1%

Polish vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Polish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 74.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 63.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.77%), family households (64.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
Polish vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPolishTohono O'odham
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.09
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.8%
Tragic
49.8%

Polish vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Polish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 85.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.2%).
Polish vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPolishTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.3%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.4%
Excellent
6.6%

Polish vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Polish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 62.3%), no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 60.8%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.76%).
Polish vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricPolishTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.9%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.5%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.9%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.0%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
39.1%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Polish vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Polish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 63.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 47.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.6%).
Polish vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricPolishTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%