Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tlingit-Haida
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tlingit-Haida

Tohono O'odham

Average
Tragic
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Tlingit-Haida Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,589,882 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tlingit-Haida corresponds to a decrease of 18.6 Tohono O'odham.
Tlingit-Haida Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,516 compared to $30,256, a difference of 43.8%), median family income ($101,092 compared to $72,193, a difference of 40.0%), and median household income ($83,968 compared to $61,663, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 8.2%), median female earnings ($39,513 compared to $33,205, a difference of 19.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,914 compared to $45,248, a difference of 23.6%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricTlingit-HaidaTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,516
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,092
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,968
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,468
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,409
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,513
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,914
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,987
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,417
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,922
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.0%
Exceptional
22.1%

Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 156.3%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 154.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 149.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 39.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 43.4%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricTlingit-HaidaTohono O'odham
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Good
10.9%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.8%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.6%
Tragic
21.5%

Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 98.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (20.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 91.8%), and male unemployment (6.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 8.8%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTlingit-HaidaTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
8.9%

Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 29.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.4%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTlingit-HaidaTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.5%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.9%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.5%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
75.1%

Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 59.0%), births to unmarried women (32.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 54.7%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 7.6%), family households (61.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.8%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTlingit-HaidaTohono O'odham
Family Households
Tragic
61.6%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.1%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.2%
Tragic
49.8%

Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 55.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.3%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTlingit-HaidaTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.9%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Excellent
6.6%

Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 59.2%), bachelor's degree (34.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 41.5%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.86%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricTlingit-HaidaTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.0%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.8%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and male disability (13.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 5.6%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricTlingit-HaidaTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.6%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%