Alsatian vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,554,876 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.394. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.073% in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to a decrease of 72.8 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,284 compared to $42,278, a difference of 11.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,797 compared to $55,986, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,059 compared to $88,819, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 0.70%), householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $50,565, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $38,886, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 25.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 23.8%), and single father poverty (17.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.80%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 40.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 36.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 11.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and family households with children (25.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.7% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 0.31%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.35%), and currently married (45.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 32.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 30.1%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.4%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 4th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 0.73%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.3%).