Alsatian vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,625,263 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 71.5 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $52,979, a difference of 7.5%), per capita income ($47,284 compared to $44,206, a difference of 7.0%), and median household income ($85,053 compared to $87,446, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $40,019, a difference of 0.10%), median earnings ($47,023 compared to $46,952, a difference of 0.15%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 25.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 21.2%), and single female poverty (24.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (25.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 10.6%), births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.7% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.070%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and married-couple households (44.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.8%), no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.0%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.38%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%).