Alsatian vs Immigrants from Switzerland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,468,721 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.406. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Immigrants from Switzerland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 85.2 Immigrants from Switzerland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($103,010 compared to $120,726, a difference of 17.2%), per capita income ($47,284 compared to $54,866, a difference of 16.0%), and median male earnings ($55,380 compared to $63,944, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $53,528, a difference of 8.6%), median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $43,996, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,797 compared to $69,343, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (19.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 26.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 26.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and single father poverty (17.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 18.3%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.7% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.22%), and family households with children (25.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.0%), no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.93%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 43.9%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 36.0%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.3%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.9%).