Alsatian vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alsatian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alsatians

Burmese

Fair
Exceptional
4,075
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
206th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Alsatian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,582,036 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.364. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.080% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to a decrease of 80.3 Burmese.
Alsatian Integration in Burmese Communities

Alsatian vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($85,053 compared to $103,145, a difference of 21.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,435 compared to $121,444, a difference of 20.9%), and median family income ($103,010 compared to $123,369, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,284 compared to $52,005, a difference of 10.0%), householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $54,800, a difference of 11.2%), and median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $44,911, a difference of 12.1%).
Alsatian vs Burmese Income
Income MetricAlsatianBurmese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,284
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Average
$103,010
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Average
$85,053
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Good
$47,023
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,380
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,060
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,267
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,059
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,435
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,797
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
28.0%

Alsatian vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (19.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 47.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 45.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and single father poverty (17.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.2%).
Alsatian vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricAlsatianBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Poor
9.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.3%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Exceptional
8.6%

Alsatian vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.5%).
Alsatian vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlsatianBurmese
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Poor
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%

Alsatian vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Alsatian vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlsatianBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.7%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.9%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.8%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
83.6%

Alsatian vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 28.3%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and family households with children (25.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and family households (61.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 6.6%).
Alsatian vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlsatianBurmese
Family Households
Tragic
61.7%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.8%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Poor
45.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
26.4%

Alsatian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 36.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 14.9%).
Alsatian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlsatianBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.2%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.1%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.5%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
6.8%

Alsatian vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.7%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.0%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%).
Alsatian vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricAlsatianBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Good
95.8%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Average
93.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Good
92.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Good
89.4%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.0%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.3%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.0%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.6%

Alsatian vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 28.2%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.1%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.9%).
Alsatian vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricAlsatianBurmese
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.3%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%