Alsatian vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,429,717 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.324% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to a decrease of 323.9 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,284 compared to $36,823, a difference of 28.4%), median family income ($103,010 compared to $86,989, a difference of 18.4%), and median male earnings ($55,380 compared to $46,941, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $51,387, a difference of 4.3%), and median household income ($85,053 compared to $75,420, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 38.2%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 37.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (24.5% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 3.3%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 46.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.1%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.1%), and family households with children (25.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.8% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.37%), currently married (45.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 32.0%), no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 64.7%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.6%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.47%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.6%).