Alsatian vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,875,210 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.385% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 384.8 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 27.6%), per capita income ($47,284 compared to $41,476, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,797 compared to $55,598, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $40,895, a difference of 2.1%), median earnings ($47,023 compared to $45,729, a difference of 2.8%), and median household income ($85,053 compared to $80,373, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 25.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.25%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 38.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 18.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.2%), currently married (45.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and married-couple households (44.8% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.90%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (61.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 87.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 34.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 13.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 30.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.5%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 33.9%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.4%).