Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

COMPARE

Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Taiwanese

Soviet Union

Good
Good
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Soviet Union Integration in Taiwanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,576,326 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.636% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 1,636.3 Soviet Union.
Taiwanese Integration in Soviet Union Communities

Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,455 compared to $54,202, a difference of 16.7%), median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $46,556, a difference of 14.7%), and median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $63,382, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,894 compared to $62,848, a difference of 0.070%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and median household income ($89,900 compared to $95,098, a difference of 5.8%).
Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Income
Income MetricTaiwaneseSoviet Union
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,455
Exceptional
$54,202
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,295
Exceptional
$119,262
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,900
Exceptional
$95,098
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,902
Exceptional
$54,290
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,556
Exceptional
$63,382
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,576
Exceptional
$46,556
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,804
Exceptional
$55,340
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,492
Exceptional
$108,457
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,180
Exceptional
$112,008
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,894
Excellent
$62,848
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
24.2%

Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 15.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.080%), male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.30%).
Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Poverty
Poverty MetricTaiwaneseSoviet Union
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Good
11.0%
Good
11.1%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.5%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Excellent
11.1%

Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTaiwaneseSoviet Union
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%

Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTaiwaneseSoviet Union
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Average
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.8%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Good
83.0%

Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.5%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.89%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTaiwaneseSoviet Union
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
60.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
24.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Fair
46.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Exceptional
26.3%

Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 58.6%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 49.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 41.2%).
Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTaiwaneseSoviet Union
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
17.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Tragic
82.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Tragic
45.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.0%
Tragic
14.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
4.4%

Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.9%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 27.6%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%).
Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Education Level
Education Level MetricTaiwaneseSoviet Union
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.4%
Exceptional
71.1%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.7%
Exceptional
55.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.0%
Exceptional
47.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.5%

Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 39.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Taiwanese vs Soviet Union Disability
Disability MetricTaiwaneseSoviet Union
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Fair
2.5%