Taiwanese vs Welsh Community Comparison

COMPARE

Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Welsh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Taiwanese

Welsh

Good
Good
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,335
SOCIAL INDEX
60.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
156th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Welsh Integration in Taiwanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,633,477 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.419. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.363% in Welsh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 362.6 Welsh.
Taiwanese Integration in Welsh Communities

Taiwanese vs Welsh Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 15.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $93,039, a difference of 9.1%), and median household income ($89,900 compared to $83,628, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $50,597, a difference of 1.6%), median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $54,647, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,894 compared to $60,666, a difference of 3.7%).
Taiwanese vs Welsh Income
Income MetricTaiwaneseWelsh
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,455
Fair
$43,233
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,295
Average
$102,151
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,900
Fair
$83,628
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,902
Fair
$45,710
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,556
Average
$54,647
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,576
Tragic
$37,856
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,804
Tragic
$50,597
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,492
Fair
$93,039
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,180
Average
$100,322
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,894
Average
$60,666
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Tragic
28.9%

Taiwanese vs Welsh Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 28.8%), single father poverty (14.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Taiwanese vs Welsh Poverty
Poverty MetricTaiwaneseWelsh
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Poor
14.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Average
17.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Excellent
15.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.5%
Tragic
30.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.3%

Taiwanese vs Welsh Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 51.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 43.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Taiwanese vs Welsh Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTaiwaneseWelsh
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%

Taiwanese vs Welsh Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 24.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Taiwanese vs Welsh Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTaiwaneseWelsh
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
64.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
42.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
82.3%

Taiwanese vs Welsh Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 10.5%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (63.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Taiwanese vs Welsh Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTaiwaneseWelsh
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
48.8%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Fair
32.0%

Taiwanese vs Welsh Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 62.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 5.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 12.7%).
Taiwanese vs Welsh Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTaiwaneseWelsh
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
93.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
60.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.0%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.5%

Taiwanese vs Welsh Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 69.8%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (66.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.50%), 2nd grade (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Taiwanese vs Welsh Education Level
Education Level MetricTaiwaneseWelsh
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.4%
Good
66.0%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Average
59.5%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.7%
Fair
45.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.0%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
1.9%

Taiwanese vs Welsh Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 32.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Taiwanese vs Welsh Disability
Disability MetricTaiwaneseWelsh
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Excellent
47.0%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Average
2.5%