Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Taiwanese

Zimbabweans

Good
Exceptional
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Taiwanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,407,870 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.235% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 235.3 Zimbabweans.
Taiwanese Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,894 compared to $65,854, a difference of 4.7%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $98,586, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $40,798, a difference of 0.55%), median earnings ($47,902 compared to $48,229, a difference of 0.68%), and median household income ($89,900 compared to $90,618, a difference of 0.80%).
Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricTaiwaneseZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,455
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,295
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,900
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,902
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,556
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,576
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,804
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,492
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,180
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,894
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Fair
26.3%

Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.49%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricTaiwaneseZimbabwean
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
9.5%

Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 33.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 32.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTaiwaneseZimbabwean
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%

Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTaiwaneseZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
84.0%

Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.3%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.60%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.97%).
Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTaiwaneseZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Exceptional
28.7%

Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.3%).
Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTaiwaneseZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.0%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Good
6.4%

Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.2%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.78%).
Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricTaiwaneseZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.4%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.7%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.0%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.3%

Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and female disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.79%).
Taiwanese vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricTaiwaneseZimbabwean
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%