New Zealander vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
New Zealander
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
New Zealanders
Pima
15.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
87.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,265,230 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 81.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Pima |
| Minimum | 4.2% | 11.0% |
| Maximum | 52.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 48.7% | 89.0% |
| Mean | 17.6% | 41.2% |
| Median | 13.7% | 34.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 21.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.8% | 57.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 36.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 25.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Jordan (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
| South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
| New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |