Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,392,866 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Immigrant from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.059% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina corresponds to a decrease of 59.3 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,278 compared to $53,154, a difference of 25.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,819 compared to $110,398, a difference of 24.3%), and median family income ($97,432 compared to $120,487, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,565 compared to $54,389, a difference of 7.6%), wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and median female earnings ($38,886 compared to $44,169, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (16.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 21.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.72%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.4%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.12, a difference of 0.85%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (61.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 58.3%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 52.5%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%), male disability (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.8%).