Native/Alaskan vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 467,402,496 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Russians within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 10.1 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $53,154, a difference of 59.7%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $120,487, a difference of 48.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $110,398, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 14.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $54,389, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $67,626, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 91.3%), married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 89.5%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 79.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 30.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 33.0%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 34.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 62.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 60.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 59.8%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 53.4%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.7%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.12, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 114.2%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 96.8%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 92.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 50.4%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.5%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 16.6%).