French vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 509,881,550 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Russians within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.340. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.118% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 118.3 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,685 compared to $53,154, a difference of 21.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,665 compared to $110,398, a difference of 17.9%), and median family income ($102,368 compared to $120,487, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $54,389, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $67,626, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Russian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 18.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and single female poverty (22.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.44%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.82%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Russian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 19.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.26%), married-couple households (48.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 55.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 49.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.0%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.3% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.1%).