Luxembourger vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,973,343 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.036% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 35.5 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $53,154, a difference of 16.4%), median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $63,939, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $110,398, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $54,389, a difference of 8.0%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $44,169, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Russian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.23%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 23.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.16%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.12, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 116.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 37.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.7%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Russian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.5%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.23%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.96%).