Immigrants from Congo vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,999,882 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Russians within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.248% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 247.8 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $110,398, a difference of 52.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $116,328, a difference of 49.4%), and per capita income ($35,720 compared to $53,154, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $54,389, a difference of 25.7%), median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $44,169, a difference of 28.7%), and wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 66.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 64.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (22.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 31.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 53.6%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 31.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 3.0%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.12, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (59.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 73.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 60.1%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.3%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.7%).