Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,192,109 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Russians within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,529 compared to $53,154, a difference of 34.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $110,398, a difference of 34.2%), and median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $63,939, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $54,389, a difference of 13.5%), householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $67,626, a difference of 15.9%), and median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $44,169, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 40.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 38.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.2%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 24.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.12, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 50.6%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.1%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.2%).