Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,772,764 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.345. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.096% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 96.4 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Russian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $110,398, a difference of 12.8%), per capita income ($47,394 compared to $53,154, a difference of 12.1%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $63,939, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $54,389, a difference of 4.8%), householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $67,626, a difference of 6.3%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $44,169, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Russian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 11.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.60%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.99%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 13.5%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.9%), female disability (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.1%).