Navajo vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,143,722 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.581. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 6.7 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $53,154, a difference of 83.1%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $120,487, a difference of 69.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $116,328, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 25.2%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $54,389, a difference of 28.3%), and median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $44,169, a difference of 33.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 174.3%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 152.4%), and male poverty (22.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 126.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 47.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 55.3%), and single female poverty (31.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 65.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 109.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 96.3%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 92.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 83.8%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 67.4%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (66.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.5%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 120.4%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 107.3%), and bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 92.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 57.6%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 55.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.9%).