Peruvian vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 351,393,687 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Russians within Peruvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Peruvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Peruvians corresponds to a decrease of 6.9 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,479 compared to $53,154, a difference of 19.5%), median male earnings ($55,659 compared to $63,939, a difference of 14.9%), and median family income ($105,444 compared to $120,487, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,052 compared to $54,389, a difference of 3.1%), householder income over 65 years ($62,766 compared to $67,626, a difference of 7.7%), and median household income ($90,261 compared to $98,008, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.6%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 21.9%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.68%), single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.7%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.84%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.19%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 43.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.1%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.25%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.6%).