Houma vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,885,253 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.078% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 78.3 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,996 compared to $47,248, a difference of 43.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $102,777, a difference of 42.6%), and wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $49,113, a difference of 10.7%), median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $57,572, a difference of 13.9%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $48,617, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 93.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 77.5%), and single male poverty (23.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 74.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 24.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 39.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 82.6%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 49.1%), and unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 50.6%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 40.0%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.4%), currently married (45.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.06, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 137.9%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 136.0%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 121.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 66.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 62.3%), and ambulatory disability (9.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.2%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.3%).